Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: WFTO=DK1 or DK2?

  
  1. #21
    Fly PumpkinKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Delaware, USA
    Posts
    53

    Default Re: WFTO=DK1 or DK2?

    Ok, one question
    Will it be more feral looking units as opposed to humanoids?
    DK2 felt more like establishing a human settlement, there weren't many creatures IMO.
    *Feral=Beetle, Spider, Bile Demon, Salamander,

  2. #22
    Mistress kyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    936
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: FOG I Kyle PSN ID: CreamedCustard Steam ID: kylemotherwell

    Default Re: WFTO=DK1 or DK2?

    Yes, we will have more feral creatures.

  3. #23

    Default Re: WFTO=DK1 or DK2?

    First of, hey I'm new, great to find that there are still a lot of people that love this franchise and I applaud this project.

    I have a question concerning this topic, it may be a little in depth though. Like many, I prefer DK1 to DK2, but I felt one thing that DK2 got right was that each creature had a specific role. There were almost no creatures who were meant for the same thing. In DK1, some creatures overlap and I know that in strategy games, overlapping roles are often confusing for the non hardcore players. Are you guys doing anything to make sure that each creature has a distinct role, or are you not worried about overlapping?

  4. #24
    Elite Dragon Mothrayas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,635

    Default Re: WFTO=DK1 or DK2?

    Each creature got a specific role in DK2? To my knowledge, it was actually worse than DK1 because everything except Black Knights, Dark Angels and Warlocks (for research) was pretty much useless.

    Anyway, yes, we're trying to make sure that every creature has a specific role. The primary goal is that every single creature has its own uses - even the DK1 Beetle will be useful.

    The Awakening


  5. #25

    Default Re: WFTO=DK1 or DK2?

    I have to agree with you that they were mostly useless (definitely in multiplayer), that was mostly because the game was poorly balanced around the roles, but they did have their own roles, especially early game. Goblins were definitely meant to do something, they were meant to protect you while you got your Dungeon up and running, but because it was so easy to get Black Knights early on why did you even need that?

    I hope that clarifies what I meant a bit. Because if a creature won't do anything for you, why get it?

    Thanks for the quick answer!

Similar Threads

  1. DK1 vs DK2 vs WftO comparison
    By Blutonium in forum War for the Overworld
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: June 1st, 2011, 02:35
  2. WFTO's GUI
    By kyle in forum War for the Overworld
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 17th, 2011, 23:25
  3. videos of wfto
    By fantasm0 in forum War for the Overworld
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: January 24th, 2011, 20:44

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •