Originally Posted by
Metal Gear Rex
I cannot pretend to even remotely understand the aggression towards Moth......
...The attitude towards Moth seems quite frankly uncalled for. All he's doing is voicing his opinions on the matter, and even stating that those are his views. You should never shut out a person's voice because he says something you disagree with or do not want to hear, which is the only attitude I'm seeing now from you, dayokay. All that can ever accomplish is create a limitation on something or someone's potential. I will not tolerate any more of it..
What is happening here? Are you his dad? I told him what I thought, he told me what he thought. It's done. Aggression?! Where do you fit in? And the idea that you can lecture me on "create a limitation on something or someone's potential" - are you for real? I have read a lot of this forum, and the rudest person on here is not difficult to identify.
Originally Posted by
Metal Gear Rex
I will not tolerate any more of it..
Is this your forum? Are you threatening to exclude me? Extraordinary. As well as a largely negative view, it would seem that any deviation from your established orthodoxy generates a wave? To quote Moth, would you rather I kiss your ass instead?
The survey reveals a number of people who have views that differ with yours. Don't panic - embrace the diversity. If you're right, as you no doubt always are, no campaign will result, and your smugness is enhanced, despite no additional campaigns. If you're wrong, a good campaign could result, and you'd have the option to play it. It's difficult to see a downside.
At the risk of returning to the topic in hand, on reflection, I'm not sure a campaign compiled from single maps would be the best way to go. As Wyrmcast says, improving existing campaigns would probably be the best way. This does raise the issue of modifying others' work though, and that would need resolving.
dayokay